雅思写作真题还原
You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.
In order to improve the quality of education, high school students should be encouraged to evaluate and criticize their teachers, but other think it will result in loss of respect and discipline in classroom. Discuss both sides and give your own idea
Use your own ideas, knowledge and experience and support your arguments with examples and relevant evidence.
Write at least 150 words.
题源分析
此题主要包括两点：首先，对题中给出的两个观点进行讨论：讨论包括展示观点、分析观点成因并发表自己对该观点的看法三个部分，当然也可以适当地举些例子。然后，表述自己的观点并阐明理由。观点可以从前面借鉴。
推荐格式是：
第一段：复述题干，描述双方争论的焦点：大学生对教师进行评价带来的影响。
第二段：讨论一种观点：大学生对教师进行评价可以提高教学质量，因为这样增加了彼此间的交流，对此应予以提倡。
第三段：讨论另外一种观点：大学生对教师进行评价会使课堂失去庄重性和纪律性，因为这样会降低老师在学生心目中的尊者地位。
第四段：总结并提出自己观点：对于与教学相关的问题，学生可以在尊重他人原则
的基础上自由评价：与教学无关的问题，则不应该评价。教学相长，师生共同进步。
其他参考观点：
应该对老师进行评价的理由：
1.公立学校的老师会对此有危机感，从而更加注重教学质量。
2.学生的立场由被动变为主动，提高学习积极性。
3.师生之间交流增加，双方在课堂上的合作会更加轻松愉快。
不应该对老师进行评价的理由：
1.一些非常优秀但比较保守的老师可能会难以接受这一改变，从而影响教学质量。
2.老师的压力会大大增加，对一些新的教学方法可能会不敢勇于尝试。
3.现在很多学生都是在家长的溺爱中长大，对老师进行评价会使他们对老师不再敬畏，从而更加难以管教。
At present, people pay more and more attention to the quality of education. Some people ate of the opinion that high school students should have the access to evaluate and criticize their teachers, while others are opposed to this.
People who advocate the process of evaluating the teachers think it could enhance the communication between the teachers and the students which will be an aid to the teaching quality improvement. As is known to everyone that traditional cramming method of teaching only emphasizes the transmission of knowledge instead of cultivating the student's thinking power or his ability to organize and work, and innovation concept. However, we have reached a stage which stresses interactive learning now. The feedback from the students enables the teachers to know what the students like and what they don't like in class. The teachers could adjust their teaching methods in order to help the students understand and acquire more.
Each thing has its relative merits and disadvantages. Some regard the evaluation and critics of teachers as a disrespectful action. The sense of distance disappears, and the students may stop respecting their teachers and ignore the discipline in class. Their fear is justified.
In my opinion, the advantages of this kind of evaluation outweigh the disadvantages. Of course, the students' comments and thoughts had better be associated with studying and teaching. As for the teachers' private life, it is not suitable. Based on adequate communication and mutual respect, the quality of education can easily be improved.
